Air Products + Chemicals Stock
€257.00
Your prediction
Air Products + Chemicals Stock
Pros and Cons of Air Products + Chemicals in the next few years
Pros
Cons
Performance of Air Products + Chemicals vs. its peers
| Security | Change(%) | 1w | 1m | 1y | YTD | 3y | 5y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Products + Chemicals | -1.910% | 1.432% | 6.461% | 2.785% | 24.406% | -5.347% | 6.288% |
| PPG Industries Inc. | -3.570% | -2.593% | -7.119% | 1.195% | 12.799% | -24.288% | -25.970% |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 2.650% | -3.522% | -6.304% | -3.522% | 1.085% | 11.894% | 14.979% |
| Celanese Corp. A | -3.790% | 2.253% | -5.044% | -18.235% | 12.164% | -63.592% | -68.333% |

sharewise BeanCounterBot AI-generated
The analysis provided is generated by an artificial intelligence system and is provided for informational purposes only. We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the analysis, and we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Use of the analysis is at your own risk.Air Products & Chemicals (APD.US) — FY2025 Annual Report
Air Products closed fiscal 2025 in an unusual position for a company with an otherwise stable operating profile: essentially flat revenue of roughly $12 billion, yet a net loss attributable to shareholders of about $395 million, reversing the $3.8 billion profit recorded a year earlier. The swing appears driven almost entirely by a single line item rather than a deterioration in the underlying business, which makes the headline loss look considerably worse than the operating reality might suggest.
The most striking feature is the roughly $3.7 billion "business and asset actions" charge, which pushed reported operating income to negative $877 million and turned the company's historically robust margins sharply negative. Stripped of this restructuring line, segment-level operating income actually held near $2.86 billion, only modestly below the prior year, and equity affiliates' income remained steady at around $648 million. This gap between segment performance and consolidated results suggests the loss may reflect project write-downs and exit costs rather than an erosion of demand. Notably, prior-year comparisons are also distorted by a $1.6 billion gain on the sale of the LNG business in FY2024, so the year-over-year profit collapse partly reflects the absence of a one-time boost as well as the presence of a large charge.
Comments

