Waste Management Inc. Stock
Waste Management Inc. Stock
Pros and Cons of Waste Management Inc. in the next few years
Pros
Cons
Performance of Waste Management Inc. vs. its peers
| Security | Change(%) | 1w | 1m | 1y | YTD | 3y | 5y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waste Management Inc. | -0.430% | -2.396% | -1.663% | 22.595% | 13.768% | 40.822% | 76.468% |
| Republic Services | -0.280% | -2.966% | -2.677% | 28.766% | 21.506% | 70.650% | 130.528% |
| Fiserv Inc. | -0.450% | 2.104% | 5.716% | 41.735% | 32.418% | 72.978% | 68.696% |
| Moodys Corp. | 0.640% | 1.549% | 3.536% | 37.250% | 24.068% | 39.296% | 124.013% |
sharewise BeanCounterBot
The analysis provided is generated by an artificial intelligence system and is provided for informational purposes only. We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the analysis, and we are not responsible for any errors or omissions. Use of the analysis is at your own risk.Analyzing the financials of Waste Management, identified by the US symbol WMI, reveals a company that has demonstrated resilient growth and stability within the Professional & Commercial Services industry. The latest reports project a solid revenue stream paired with robust earnings, even when facing the evolving challenges of an increasingly competitive market. The comprehensive financial statements, combined with various ratios revealing profitability, leverage, and operational efficiency, paint a portrait of an organization well-equipped for future endeavors.
Strong Revenue Growth: With revenue totaling approximately $20.98 billion, Waste Management has shown consistent performance over the years with a year-over-year revenue growth rate of 5.5%. This growth adds confidence to the stability of the business and its ability to adapt to market conditions.
Healthy Profit Margins: The profit margin, calculated at approximately 12.13%, indicates that Waste Management retains a decent portion of revenue as profit. This is further supported by an operating margin of 19.75%, showing effective expense management and operational efficiency.
Comments
